Bailout Hillary

The latest bailout craze… Considering the economy and the people that voted for Obama because they felt he was going to help him, this is disturbing… Obama and Hillary expect the people to bail her out… She needs to pay off her own debt, the debt she incurred because she could not manager her spending budget… I guess Bill and Hillary don’t have enough money, they need to ask YOU to pay their bills…

More Change You Can Believe In!

NEW YORK — President-elect Barack Obama’s vast list of donors is being asked to donate to Hillary Rodham Clinton as she scrambles to reduce her massive campaign debt before she becomes secretary of state and federal ethics rules limit her fundraising, an Obama adviser said Thursday night.

An appeal on Clinton’s behalf signed by Vice President-elect Joe Biden is to be sent by e-mail to all of the more than three million donors to Obama’s record-setting fundraising, according to this adviser, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the e-mail had not yet been sent.

Obama promised after Clinton endorsed him to help her pay off her debt and this is the second time the Obama list has been asked to help Clinton. It was used once during the campaign as well, but its second use underlines the urgency of Clinton’s task now that she is Obama’s choice to be secretary of state.

Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, will headline a major debt retirement event in New York Dec. 15 with “Ugly Betty” star America Ferrera as master of ceremonies.

Tickets range from $50 to $1,000, with top donors earning a premium seat and a backstage photo with the former first lady.

Clinton also plans to sell a children’s book, titled “Dreams Taking Flight” by author Kathleen Krull, about her pioneering candidacy. Clinton’s mother, Dorothy Rodham, planned to send an e-mail to supporters later this week asking them to purchase the book to help raise funds to pay down Clinton’s debt.

On Tuesday, a day after Obama announced she would serve as his top diplomat, Bill Clinton signed an e-mail to supporters asking them to send a note of congratulations to his wife and including a link for contributing to her debt retirement.

The urgency is rooted in the size of the New York senator’s unpaid bills and the fundraising restrictions she will face once she joins Obama’s cabinet.

At the beginning of November, Clinton owed $7.5 million to vendors from her failed presidential bid, according to campaign finance records. The largest share of the debt — about $5.3 million — is owed to the polling firm of Mark Penn, the Clintons’ longtime political strategist. She owes hundreds of thousands of dollars for printing, equipment rental, phone banks and other services.

Clinton has slowly been trimming the debt since suspending her campaign last June, partly with Obama’s help. But her fundraising efforts will be curtailed if she is confirmed as secretary of state and becomes covered by the Hatch Act, which regulates political involvement by federal employees.

A 2001 advisory opinion by the federal Office of Special Counsel said a federal employee with a campaign debt would be prohibited from “personally soliciting, accepting or receiving political contributions.” That means Clinton’s political committee could keep raising money to pay off her creditors, but without her direct involvement.

The lack of access to Clinton could pose a disincentive for donors, said Sheila Krumholz, director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political donations.

“People write a check to get into the room with a candidate or government official. If she’s legally barred from fundraising, the No. 1 reason for giving has been removed,” Krumholz said. “It’s like attending a wedding and the bride isn’t there.”

The advisory opinion does allow the former candidate to appear briefly at fundraising events and thank donors. That restriction could suit Clinton well, according to some of her top bundlers who say neither she nor her husband has ever been good at asking for donations.

But none of the Hatch Act rules apply until Clinton is confirmed, so there’s an opportunity for people eager to get some face time with the incoming secretary of state. Aides said she will try to avoid doing anything that suggests she is leveraging her new post for fundraising advantage.

Brad Smith, a former Federal Election Commission chairman, said Clinton would be wise to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest.

“If nothing else, there’s the embarrassment element,” Smith said. “A secretary of state trying to raise campaign money is kind of ugly.”

Clinton’s new job will help her avoid some pitfalls that loom when political access linked to campaign donations. For example, foreign citizens, who might be interested in forging a relationship with an incoming secretary of state, are legally barred from contributing to U.S. political campaigns.

Still, Krumholz said, there are plenty of U.S. citizens with strong ties to other countries who would welcome the chance to write Clinton a check.

“Wealthy people who have family overseas and are tied to issues in the country — human rights issues, for example — have more incentive to give,” Krumholz said.

Analysts said that fundraising to retire a politician’s debt — never easy — is more difficult during the recession. Also, Clinton is trying to pay off debts from the Democratic primaries, where many of her supporters already gave the maximum $2,300 per person. They cannot be solicited again.

The large share of her debt owed to Penn, a controversial figure and harsh Obama critic, also complicates matters for Clinton. Many Democrats blamed him for her strategic failings.

Clinton also has about $6 million in her Senate re-election account; some of that could be used under strict restrictions to help pay these debts. Under FEC rules, she would need to ask each contributor’s permission to move the donation to her debt retirement account — and none could come from people who already contributed the maximum to her presidential bid.

Kenyan Ambassador To The US, Peter Ogego – Acknowledges Barack Was Born In Kenya

According to Debbie Schlussel, during an interview between WRIF and Kenyan Ambassador to the US, Peter Ogego, he admitted that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Schlussel provides a link to another video speech to compare voices… Why won’t the Supreme Court and Congress address this issue? This is our Constitution that is in danger here. First his own grandmother says she was at his birth in a Kenyan hospital and now this. The Supreme Court and Congress as well as President Bush need to investigate this issue as is their duty to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States. If the allegations are false, fine, but they should not be ignored.

To listen to the audio clip click the first link below and click the Play Now link – Go to 12 minutes 30 seconds and listen carefully.

Change You Can Believe In!

My friends Mark Fellhauer, Mike Wolters, and Mike Clark of Detroit’s “Mike in the Morning” show on WRIF-FM spoke with the Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S. Peter Ogego and got him to admit, matter-of-factly, that Barack Hussein Obama was, indeed, born in Kenya. He also says they plan to mark his birthplace there. This is not a fake call. These guys don’t do those. (The interview is almost 20 minutes, but the admission starts at 12:30 into the interview.) You can compare Ogego’s voice with this video of a speech he made to verify that it is, indeed, him.

Kenyan Ambassador to U.S. Peter Ogego: Yup, Obama Was Born in KenyaAlthough I listen to their show most mornings, thanks to KFAQ Tulsa morning radio host Pat Campbell (on whose show I frequently appear, including this morning) for the alert. Thanks also to Bob McCarty, who also sent the tip and wrote about it.

Obama Supporters: A League Of Their Own

Easing Expectations Of Obama’s Promise Of A Lobbyist Free Administration

Obama promised an administration free of lobbyist influence, however he is not living up to those words based on his selections so far. Now I was surpised to see Campbell Brown reporting this. Then I thought about why she would be reporting this and it dawned on me, the media is trying to “ease” the expectations of an Obama presidency. They are doing nothing more than making it palatable to the public in stages so when Obama does take the post, the burden of living up to his promises would be eased, which if you remember was one of the things his camp was trying to do in the last weeks of the campaign. This is nothing more than a sympathy criticism, with the aim of making the people understand how hard it is for Obama to do the things he campaigned on and not to expect him to…

More Change You Can Believe In!

I want you to hear something President-elect Barack Obama said just about a year ago:

“I am running to tell the lobbyists in Washington that their days of setting the agenda are over. They have not funded my campaign. They won’t work in my White House.”

Just this weekend The New York times published a list of names — a rather long list of names of people — who are working on Obama’s transition team or who have accepted jobs in his White House who are either former lobbyists or who have close ties to lobbyists.

The Times reports that some of those people were lobbying as recently as this year. 

 Watch Campbell Brown’s commentary »

Now, the Obama team is quick to point out that their rules and restrictions on lobbying ties are far stricter than any previous administration.

And the Obama folks concede that eliminating anyone in Washington who had ever lobbied Congress or who has a family member who lobbied Congress would be foolish.

And it’s true, you could argue the reality of Washington and our government is that lobbyists are often the most informed people on a given issue.

But we certainly never heard Obama articulate it quite that way when he was candidate Obama. What he said then was:

“That’s what happens when lobbyists set the agenda and that’s why they won’t drown out your voices anymore when I am president of the United States of America.”

And that is a promise that he may already be struggling to keep.

Ayers And Dohrn Interview

Ayers talks about leaving an era of fear based on 9/11, the typical liberal position that Bush was reelected based on fear of another attack… Well how about the fear of a complete economic collapse that camp Obama used in the election. Or how about the fear that Sarah Palin would have been one heartbeat away from the Presidency. Those were Fear based campaigns created by the Obama camp.

The he goes on to talk about repression and constitutional shreading and scapegoating of gay and lesbian people… Well Obama’s victory has created more division with the gay and lesbian community… Mr. Ayers watch the news, Prop8 has created a firestorm. The large turnout of voters for Barack is more than likely the cause of it, the same people voting for Barack decided to vote against gay and lesbians…

Then he rambles on about creating new movements that the President has to react to… I wonder if these are the same movements as he advocated in the 60s.

His wonderful wife then goes on to talk about the joy the world felt about the election of Barack Obama.

Notice how she includes EVERYONE by naming any possible situation and place… The country is still just as divided politically as it was prior to the elections. Remember Barack Obama only got 52% of the vote. That is not even close to an overwhelming majority… Then goes on to say it is a “pretty decisive” rejection of the politics of fear… Again what about the Obama fear factor…

Then she goes on to talk about this election proved the Bradly effect has been overcome… Well then case closed, the racist America that was potrayed prior to the election was proven false, thus the blaming the White man for everything needs to stop.

And then… She tries to show that the Ayers controversy and the question that many of us have, who is Barack Obama and what does he really stand for, we do not know enough about him, is false… Sorry honey, I do not know enough about him. He has used this mask of hiding things from the public until he gets caught on it to hide who he is or his lack of experience.

What is known about Barack Obama is minimal, less that we knew about Sarah Palin, yet she was only running for Vice President. Yet the media found everything out about her.

Then the big denial… He only knew them casually… Read your husbands book… Family Friends.

He has been vetted and vetted and vetted… No he hasn’t. He has been questioned by the people and we have not gotten satisfactory answers to those questions. The media has avoided any real investigation in him. Each time something comes out, he alienates those involved, including you and your husband.

Then she goes into the African American man racism etc… Which she disproved by her statement of the Bradly effect not happening during the election.

Neither of them think we are in a post racial world… Well of course not, how many black people voted for Barack Obama because he is black? How many white people voted for Barack Obama out of fear of being labelled racists if they did not, How many white people voted for Barack Obama out of feeling guilty for the treatment of black people…

The fear of a black man as president was rejected by almost all sectors of the population… 52% honey… Those things had already been rejected prior to the election… Most of us that voted for McCain did so because he was the lesser of the two evils, it had nothing to do with race for us. This fear of the blackman was not a factor for us.

 

MSNBC Rewarded For Obama Support With GE Bailout Money

If this is true then America has truly hit rock bottom in terms of our Media. Again Congress has setup nothing in terms of oversight and money is flowing freely. Congress has failed America again. The liberals in Congress have given your money to those that caused this financial collapse and in return you are getting nothing. The first half of the money has already been handed out and there is no return on it, lending freezes are still in place and the people are suffering for it.

More Change You Can Believe In!

Is MSNBC being rewarded for having backed Obama?  That’s what Jim Pinkerton suggests.  On this evening’s Fox News Watch, the columnist and New America Foundation fellow cited the news that GE Capital, a subsidiary of MSNBC’s parent company GE, has received a $139 billion government loan guarantee.

Host Jon Scott opened this evening’s show opened with a clip of Chris Matthews [in a story that NB was first to report], saying that he saw as his “job” making the Obama presidency a success.  Pinkerton unloaded.

JIM PINKERTON: Well, Matthews is entitled to his opinion, although if he wants to run for the Senate in Pennsylvania in 2010 as has been widely reportedhe should resign and not have a platform on the air. 

But I think that the overall culture of MSNBC was established when they changed their slogan, post-election, to “The Power of Change” [another story NB was first to report].  Now, that sounds a little bit familiar to the Obama campaign “Change We Can Believe In.”  Maybe that’s not an accident. 

But of course, I think the big story here, I think it goes right to what MSNBC’s up to as a strategy, is the news that the FDIC, which is now following election returns, is guaranteeing $139 billion of General Electric Capital debt. That’s General Electric Capital, as in General Electric, which is the parent company of MSNBC, CNBC, NBC. Now, for a $139 billion guarantee, I’d consider, I’d probably go more, I’d probably go all the way over to the Olbermann/Maddow territory. $139 billion.

The panel got off a good chuckle. But if Pinkerton is right, and news networks are being rewarded for favorable coverage of the incoming administration, we’ve entered a very bad new era indeed.

Note: Some might ask why the FDIC, still a part of the Bush administration, would reward an Obama-backing network.  But Pinkerton suggested that the FDIC has its eyes on the prospects of who will next be in power.

Note Deux: Interviewed by this NewsBuster after the show aired, Pinkerton observed:

I think that MSNBC made a fundamental strategic decision to go left, to let Keith Olbermann re-brand the network.   And it worked, big time. 

The Wall Street meltdown could not have been foreseen.   

But sometimes, one just gets lucky.  MSNBC and its sister, GE Capital, and its parent, GE, must be thanking their lucky stars, thinking that “Olbermann-ization” worked out a lot better than they could have managed. 

Although I am sure that they also think that they have earned it!

The NYTimes explains the GE scam…

General Electric said Wednesday that the federal government had agreed to insure as much as $139 billion in debt for its lending subsidiary, GE Capital. This is the second time in a month that G.E. has turned to a federal program aimed at helping companies during the global credit crisis.

GE Capital is not a bank, but granting it access to a new program from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may reassure investors and help the lender compete with banks that already have government-protected debt, a G.E. spokesman, Russell Wilkerson, told Bloomberg News.

“Inclusion in this program will allow us to source our debt competitively with other participating financial institutions,” Mr. Wilkerson said.

The F.D.I.C. program covers about $139 billion of G.E.’s debt, or 125 percent of total senior unsecured debt outstanding as of Sept. 30 and maturing by June 30.

G.E. sent investors an e-mail letter about the program on Wednesday and posted the letter on its Web site. “Our participation is a positive development for our investors,” it said.

G.E.’s finance businesses are able to seek F.D.I.C. debt coverage because its GE Capital subsidiary also owns a federal savings bank and an industrial loan company, both of which already qualify.

Last month, G.E. started using a new Federal Reserve program aimed at reviving demand for the commercial paper for a wide variety of companies.

Go to Article from Bloomberg News »
Go to Letter from General Electric (PDF) »

Tis The Season To Be Jolly

That is if you are one of Obama’s campaign staffers…

Now I do not what to hear any Obama supports who donated money to his campaign, complain about not having money for the holiday season to buy presents for your kids… You gave it to Obama and he decided to spread your wealth around… Around his campaign staff that is. So this year when you are struggling to have a nice holiday for you family and you cannot afford it, remember that Obama staffers got a bonus equal to one months salary… plus they can keep their laptops and blackberrys…

Recite this statement three times…

“It was totally unexpected, and you can’t believe how helpful this is with the holidays coming,” the lower-level worker said. “A lot of people thought they were going to be broke and would have to try to find a job in this rotten economy. It’s a huge help.”

So what about those that donated to the campaign that may have lost their jobs and are struggling already…

Well at least this lower-level worker will not have to worry about finding a job for at least a month….

Now go and pray to the One…

I also wonder if their service for their blackberrys is included until the current contracts end…

More Change You Can Believe In!

 

Updated Friday, November 14th 2008, 10:14 AM

Barack Obama is sharing the wealth with campaign staffers.

WASHINGTON – Barack Obamaended his campaign so flush with cash he’s telling staffers to keep the change – and then some.

Long-suffering political footsoldiers who toiled tirelessly, at least since September, to put Obama in theWhite House recently learned they will be getting extra paychecks worth a month’s salary, the Daily News has learned.

And boy, are they grateful.

“I think it’s a very nice gesture for people who slaved away and sacrificed for the past year,” said one pleased ex-staffer.

“It was totally unexpected, and you can’t believe how helpful this is with the holidays coming,” the lower-level worker said. “A lot of people thought they were going to be broke and would have to try to find a job in this rotten economy. It’s a huge help.”

In addition to the cold cash, staffers also have the option of keeping their campaign-issued computers andBlackBerrys – but must pay income tax on the hardware if they do.

It’s an almost unprecedented move at the end of a presidential campaign, even a winning one, because usually they are flat broke, having taken public financing and gone through every last penny.

But Obama skipped public financing and raised more than $600 million, including more than $150 million in September, and nearly $40 million in the first couple of weeks of October.

If this silver parachute approaches his September payroll, it’ll be worth upward of $3 million.

A bunch of John McCain staffers will get checks that cover much of this month, but it’s nothing like the widespread lucre flowing around Obamaland.

“They certainly didn’t pay bonuses in the McCain campaign,” one ex-staffer there said.

President Bush helped a lot of his campaign folks in 2004, moving many to theRepublican National Committee payroll until December.

RELATED: CLINTON AS SECT. OF STATE?

Billionaire Mayor Bloomberg rewarded his campaign staff with fat bonuses, but he could afford to. It’s seldom so generous on the Democratic side.

“Most campaigns you have to wait months for your last check,” an Obama staffer said. “I’m not sure this has ever been done before. Definitely not that I’ve seen.”

“I’ve heard of two weeks [pay] before, but nothing beyond that. This is very generous,” said a veteran Democratic political operative.

Word of the cash bonanza for Obama’s loyal troops comes as the President-elect has begun raising money to retire the Democratic National Committee‘s debt, even tapping his precious e-mail list to help out.

And while Obama splashes his staff with cash, Hillary Clinton is still in hock for about $21 million, including about $13 million she lent herself and will never get back.

Although she’s banking on Obama to help her pay down the remaining $8 million, he can’t use any leftover campaign cash. He’d have to tap his donors anew for her.

Clinton took care of about 40 of her campaign staffers by shifting them to the payroll of her political action committee.

It’s unclear how much campaign cash Obama has left in his war chest, a tally he’ll have to report to the feds this month.

mmcauliff@nydailynews.com

William Ayers – Obama Is A Family Friend

By Ayers own adminission in his book, delayed to be released after the 2008 election, he and Obama are Family Friends. Remember Obama flatly denied this. Obama LIED to the public, made sure Ayers and his wife did not say anything to the press prior to the election. 

Also notice the caption of the picture, Ayers listening to Rev. Wright… Obama’s spiritual guide that he also disassociated himself with… You know the God Damn America guy… hmmm. 3 Days after election day Wright and Ayers… Where’s Rashid? Maybe he is over with Hamas getting some planning done… Where is Rezko… Oh yea jail…

I do not care that he was friends with Ayers, it is the fact that he lied about it to the public and the public sucked it up.

People of America, Wake UP! More Change You Can Believe In!

 

Bill Ayers, former 1960s radical activist turned college professor, listens to Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. speak at Northwestern University during an event hosted by Northwestern’s Black Student Alliance. Ayers’ name gained prominence during the presidential race when John McCain’s campaign accused Barack Obama of having close ties to Ayers. (Tribune photo by Charles Cherney / November 7, 2008)

 

In a new afterword to his memoir, 1960s radical William Ayers describes himself as a “family friend” of President-elect Barack Obama and writes that the campaign controversy over their relationship was an effort by Obama’s political enemies to “deepen a dishonest narrative” about the candidate.

Ayers describes phone threats and hate e-mail he received during the campaign, and he bemoans Obama’s guilt by association.

During the campaign, Ayers’ friendship with Obama was a favorite subject of conservative bloggers and talk show hosts who insisted the two were closer than the candidate was admitting. Ayers’ new description of the relationship seems to contradict Obama’s statements.

Obama had dismissed Ayers as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” and “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”

A campaign spokesman told The New York Times last month that Ayers and Obama hadn’t spoken by phone or exchanged e-mail messages since Obama became a U.S. senator in January 2005. Obama himself denounced the “detestable acts” Ayers engaged in during the Vietnam era.

In the updated version of his 2001 book “Fugitive Days,” Ayers calls into question one of the more incendiary quotes attributed to him during the campaign: “I’m nowadays often quoted as saying, ‘I don’t regret setting bombs. I wish we’d set more bombs. I don’t think we did enough.’

“I never actually said that I ‘set bombs,’ nor that I wished there were ‘more bombs.’ … I killed no one, and I harmed no one, and I didn’t regret for a minute resisting the murderous assault on Viet Nam with every ounce of my being.”

He was particularly disturbed by a newspaper headline published in 2001: “No regrets for a love of explosives.”

“That’s neither my narrative nor my sentiment,” Ayers wrote, “but the idea was seized upon by the neocon media machine: I was an unrepentent and violent terrorist.”

Ayers wrote the new afterword on July 4, “in the heat of the summer presidential campaign, with all its attendant bells and whistles and spin, all the diversion and dissembling that happens every four years when the big election carnival rolls into town.”

Now a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and an expert on public school reform, Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, a radical organization that claimed responsibility for a dozen bombings from 1970 to 1974.

He’ll appear Friday on “Good Morning America” to promote the re-issue of his book this week. The Tribune obtained a copy of the updated material.

In it, Ayers — who did not respond to requests for comment — summarized his relationship with Obama: “[W]e had served together on the board of a foundation, knew one another as neighbors and family friends, held an initial fund-raiser at my house, where I’d made a small donation to his earliest political campaign.”

Ayers lamented that his relationship with Obama became an issue.

“The more serious point is that Obama was asked once more to defend something that ought to be at the very heart of democracy: the importance of talking to many people in this complicated and wildly diverse society, of listening with the possibility of learning something new, of speaking with the possibility of persuading or influencing others. … In a robust and sophisticated democracy, political leaders, indeed, all of us, would seek out ways to talk with many people who hold dissenting, even radical, ideas.”

Obama was criticized by Sen. John McCain throughout the campaign for suggesting that, as president, he would sit down with the leaders of rogue nations like Iran and attempt to have substantive discussions.

Barack Obama Selective Service Registration Possibly Falsified

Debbie Schlussel has a post on Barack Obama’s Selective Service Registration being possibly falsified. If that is the case… Be sure to read the whole thing… If what she reports is true then Barack Obama has broken the law on three counts, the first is if this was filed in 2008 he is falsifying records, two he never registered in the first place and three he never kept his records up to date as the only change was made was the original registration.

Additionally based on the date of the card, it contradicts his original statement that he registered in 1979.

If this story is true it is a slap in the face to all the members of our Military who have served our country with honor.

Now the only reason I can see for him to have had a draft registration entered into the system is because the draft registration requirement is for anyone born after January 1, 1960. Well if Obama was born prior to August 21, 1959 he would not be a US citizen. Now that is going on a stretch, but with all the law suits and other inquires into Obama citizenship status, it is note worth and could be part of a cover up of his actual birth.

For now I am going to assume this is all a coincidence however it is important to keep this information public and let as many people know about it so if other information comes up all the pieces can be put together…

The Congress and Supreme Court need to investigate all charges against Barack Obama and clarify one way or the other to the public what the truth is before he is actually made President of the United States.

Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?

It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.

But the release of Obama’s draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama’s claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.

The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it’s proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.

But the Selective Service System registration (“SSS Form 1”) and accompanying computer print-out (“SSS Print-out), below, released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:

* Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008

First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case “0897080632,” which I’ve labeled as “A” on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation.

As the retired federal agent notes:

Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except the 0 and 8 have changed positions making it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a “corrected” DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It’s quite a “coincidence” . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.

Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama’s lack of having done so, and that the person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to “80” instead of the current “80”. They either forgot to fake the DLN number or couldn’t do so.

And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded? Lucky for Obama, it’s his native Chicago. From an article entitled, “Post Office Registration Process”, on the Selective Service website:

When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the man’s registration.Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System’s Data Management System (DMC) near Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities.Each card is then microfilmed and stamped with a sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is reviewed to account for all documents and to ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.

 

The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 7-8 of this Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to “08” in error. So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 DLN?!

* Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form

On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as “B“. On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as “FEB” (February), and the year is either “80” or “90”. The retired federal agent investigated further:

Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either a “80” or a “90”.

But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#), it’s apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a “Request for a new OMB control number” for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)–meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in “FEB 1980”.

Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it’s nearly impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama’s SSS Form 1 to be dated “Feb 1980.” And since that makes it almost certainly dated “Feb 1990,” then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.

The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as “C“. The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.

* Barack Obama’s Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature

Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1’s “Today’s date” as July 30, 1980, labeled “D“. But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day’s date of July 29, 1980, labeled “E“. Yes, Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for someone to put a future date than a past date.

* Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970

Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The “postmark” stamp–labeled “E“–is hard to read, but it is clear that at the bottom is “USPO” which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current “postmark” validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows “USPS” for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic–Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1, 1971.

Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack Obama’s suspicious Selective Service registration form?

* Form Shows Barack Obama didn’t have ID

The SSS Form 1 states “NO ID”, labeled “F“. Since that’s the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?

* The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.

The retired federal agent who FOIA’d Barack Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form notes:

Early this year, when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:

Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm with our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.Sincerely,

Janice L. Hughes/SSS

 

Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?

On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the classes of which commenced August 24, 1980.

 

* Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page

Where is Obama’s Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the card?

And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request prior to the request having been made:

The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled “G“], but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled “H“]. My FOIA was dated October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA? I gave them no “heads up” that I was sending it. In fact it was not mailed until late October–around the 25th.Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled “I“].

 

Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what’s on it?

A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service registration was faked. Either he signed the fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft (and lied about it).

Which is it?

It’s incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.

The documents indicate it’s one or the other.

O-Day At McDonalds – Free Obama Cake

The liberal idiots are already trying to get a national holiday in honor of Barack Obama… Hey people wake up, he hasn’t even done anything yet. Let’s wait and see if he is a good president… Just because he is half black does not equate to a national holiday. At least Martin Luther King accomplished something in his life time…

The Obamaphites will drive the division wedge deep and deeper pulling this crap. It’s bad enough Obama thinks he is the Messiah, all we need now is to indoctrinate children at McDonalds into praising him… Pretty soon we will have a national Obama prayer, and office Obama uniforms… let’s not stop there… How about we rename Washington DC to Washington BO or District of Obama…

More Change You Can Believe In!

And what the fuck is Obama Cake?

I urge all readers to email the two idiots below who are heading this up and let them know America is not ready for Obama Day yet… Just another day off for those who will be on the receiving end of spreading the wealth…

Plans are being made to promote a national holiday for Barack Obama, who will become the nation’s 44th president when he takes the oath of office Jan. 20.

“Yes We Can” planning rallies will be at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. every Tuesday at the downtown McDonald’s restaurant, 1100 Kansas Ave., until Jan. 13. The goals are to secure a national holiday in Obama’s honor, to organize celebrations around his inauguration and to celebrate the 200th birthday of President Abraham Lincoln, who was born on Feb. 12 1809.

At 7:30 a.m. on Inauguration Day, Obama Cake will be served at the downtown McDonald’s, and a celebration is scheduled for 8 p.m. to midnight Jan. 20 at the Ramada Hotel and Convention Center, 420 S.E. 6th.

For more information, contact Sonny Scroggins, (785) 232-3761, 845-6148 or atbiasbustersofkansas@yahoo.com; Lamont Lassiter, McDonald’s general manager, 608-2739; Ava Chander-Beard, (785) 234-9138,ava.beard@sbcglobal.net; or Rhoda Carr, (785) 220-5883.