Federal Judge Henry Kennedy has ruled that as of right now there is no evidence that the Bush Administration violated his court order not to destroy tapes of detanee interrogations at Gitmo. As the two tapes of the interrogations Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri of were taken at other facilities, the tapes were not cover by his order.
This whole investigation and express of outrage is being politicized for an agenda because there is some big campaigning going on for the next Presidency…
A federal judge refused on Wednesday to delve into the destruction of CIA interrogation videos, saying there was no evidence the Bush administration violated a court order and the Justice Department deserved time to conduct its own investigation.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy was a victory for the Bush administration, which had urged the courts not to wade into a politically charged issue already being investigated by the Justice Department, CIA and Congress.Related Stories
- Criminal Probe Opened Over CIA Tapes
- CIA Says It Cooperated With 9/11 Panel
- GOP Leader Wants CIA Tape Hearings
- Congress Defies Bush on CIA Tape Probe
- Justice Dept.: Back Off on CIA Tapes
- Mukasey Plays Hardball on CIA Tapes
- Bush Says He Didn’t Know About CIA Tapes
- White House: Miers Told CIA to Save Tapes
- Biden Wants Special Counsel on CIA Tapes
- CIA Kept Tapes From Terror Trial
- White House Blocked Waterboarding CriticTop The Law storiesadsonar_placementId=1280488;adsonar_pid=43749;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=165;adsonar_zh=220;adsonar_jv=’ads.adsonar.com’;
Kennedy disagreed, ruling that attorneys hadn’t “presented anything to cause this court to question whether the Department of Justice will follow the facts wherever they may lead and live up to the assurances it made to this court.”
Attorney General Michael Mukasey recently appointed a prosecutor to conduct a criminal investigation into destruction of the tapes. John Durham, a career public corruption and organized crime prosecutor, has a reputation for being independent.
Kennedy, a former prosecutor who was appointed to the bench by President Clinton, said he had been assured that the Justice Department would report back if it found evidence that a court order had been violated.
“There is no reason to disregard the Department of Justice’s assurances,” Kennedy said.
Attorney David Remes had said a judicial inquiry might involve testimony from senior lawyers at the White House and Justice Department. Government attorneys, appearing in court Dec. 21, said such hearings would disrupt and possibly derail the Justice Department inquiry.
Lawyers for other terrorism suspects have filed similar requests before other judges. While Kennedy’s decision doesn’t require those judges to follow suit, it will help bolster the Justice Department’s argument that they should not wade into the investigation.
Kennedy had ordered the government not to destroy any evidence of mistreatment or abuse of detainees held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But the two suspects interrogated on video Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were not held at Guantanamo Bay. They were interrogated in secret CIA prisons overseas.Kennedy said Wednesday he saw no evidence those tapes were covered by his court order.
Remes, who represents Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay, argued that destruction of the tapes may have violated a more general rule prohibiting the government from destroying any evidence that could be relevant in a case, even if not directly noted in a court order.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Filed under: Crimes, Military, National Security, Politics, Terrorism & Terrorist Threat, Under Reported, War | Tagged: Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri Henry Kennedy, Abu Zubaydah, Al Qaeda, Bill Clinton, CIA, Congress, Cuba, George Bush, Gitmo, Guantanamo Bay, Islam, Jihadist, Justice Department, Michael Mukasey, Muslim |