Former PLO Terrorist – Why We Want To Kill You

Atlas Shrugs has a nice piece on CNN’s Amapore’s Jew bashing God’s Warriors. It is a former PLO Terrorist who his now a Zionist explaining why Muslims wage Jihad based on his book Why We Want to Kill You. Listen to the whole thing, it really sheds light on the Israeli Palestinian conflict as well as the rest of the Islamic Extremists around the world. I would imaging he will have a Fatwah on him soon enough for this honest enlightment of Muslims.

SHOEBAT!  If you have time – listen. Hat tip urban infidel

Terrorist-turned-Zionist Exposes Deliberate Bias in CNN’s ‘God Warriors’
Former PLO member Walid Shoebat, author of a stunning new book “Why We Want to Kill You,” gives the listeners an inside view of how CNN’s chief international correspondent, Christiane Amanpour, blatantly distorted facts in her recent series “God Warriors.”

Listen Now

or

Download

Advertisements

14 Responses

  1. isnt “Zionist” just as bad as “Jihadist”??

    peter

  2. Simple answer No. Now I have to ask, did you even listen to what the man had to say. I can pretty much answer that based on your comment. No.
    First of all, you need to learn about Zionism and the different types of Zionsism. Second, you need to learn about Jihad, there is only one, so that should be simple.
    Third, you need to realize that anti-zionism is just a cloak and dagger for anti-Jewish.
    Fourth, you need to understand your statement is exactly what the anti-Jewish want you to believe.
    All of which you would have learned about if you had listened to the man.
    Remember this is a former PLO Terrorist who understands how the enemy things.

  3. first of all, i am sorry you felt attacked, i didnt mean to be offensive at all. it was and is a legitimate question, i think.

    second, zionism is not synonymous with supporting Israel or Jews.

    third, Jihad does not always mean “one thing”.

    fourth, i dont think one person represents all Mujahadin. i happen to be living in the Middle East and spend a significant amount of time with those who are “Mujahadin” as well as ordinary Muslims. also, i have read other people’s account of their interaction with Hamas and Hezbollah leadership that speak of the multifaceted personality of these terrorists. what i mean by that is, yes, for the most part you are right. Mujahadin are evil. but some truly want good change. and some want money to provide for their family because of what Zionists and others have done to marginalize them.

    as

  4. first of all, i am sorry you felt attacked, i didnt mean to be offensive at all. it was and is a legitimate question, i think.

    second, zionism is not synonymous with supporting Israel or Jews.

    third, Jihad does not always mean “one thing”.

    fourth, i dont think one person represents all Mujahadin. i happen to be living in the Middle East and spend a significant amount of time with those who are “Mujahadin” as well as ordinary Muslims. also, i have read other people’s account of their interaction with Hamas and Hezbollah leadership that speak of the multifaceted personality of these terrorists. what i mean by that is, yes, for the most part you are right. Mujahadin are evil. but some truly want good change. and some want money to provide for their family because of what Zionists and others have done to marginalize them.

    finally, i dont appreciate you assuming so much about me from one simple question…i love Israel and Jews. i love those who are part of Zionism (although i believe they are wrong in many areas). i love Mujahadin (although i believe they are wrong in most areas). i also love the Arabs who are innocent and downtrodden by others. so i dont think its fair to assume i am against Israel, Jews, etc. i am just for justice. i am for mercy and love. this is nothing personal against Israel.

    peter

  5. The propaganda that has been fed to Americans for over 50 years is what has been distorted.

    There are two sides to r\the story and Ameicans have only heard the Israeli side.

    Zionism is one of the causes of Jihad.

  6. gasdocpol

    i think you made exactly the point i was trying to get at…there are two sides to the story. the truth lies somewhere in the balance.

    peter

  7. The Jews went in and stole a bunch of Arab land but they fought for it and arguably earned the right to stay.

    The Palestinians should have quit when they were ahead. They decided to “Push the Jews into the sea” Instead they got their butts kicked in the 6 day war in 1967 and lost Jerusolem in the process.

    Israel filled the West bank with settlers they brought in mostly from Russia and the USA. The USA has given Israel unconditional support against the will of the UN and many of its resolutions.

    Rightly or wrongly Arabs blame the USA for Israel. Until we stop our UNCONDITIONAL support of Israel we are going to have problems in the mideast.

    I have been to 2 Bar mitzvas and I love Jewish people and their traditions. I have been a physician for over thirty years. Jews make great doctors and are great to work with. I have nothing but affection and admiration for Jews i have known in the USA. BUT WHAT ISRAEL IS DOING IS WRONG.

  8. Peter – It is a a shame you make assumptions and assume I felt attacked. I stated the facts based on your post. If oyu listened to the the broadcast, which you had not, you would have learned, as I learned long ago, the usage of the word Zionism is being used to mean Jewish by those that hate Jews. The reason for this is simple, they cannot be called anti-semetic then. I believe Martin Luther King who identified that change in terminolgy when he was still alive. As for if Zionism is for supporting Jews or Israels, yes it is, in all of its forms. Zionism ulitmately is the return to the Israel for the Jews. Christian Zionists, Muslim Zionists etc support this core ideology, the difference is how they believe it should be accomplished and what the end result is.
    Your basis of being in the Middle East is flawed in showing that Zionism=Jihad. Sounds like a Baghdad diarist comment trying to justify information, I can elaborate with proof that you are more than likely not in the Middle East, but would rather not make a public display of that information. I know many Muslims, Israelis, ect as well, do not think you are the only one that has every met with them. The key is, if you listen to the radio interview, that you have been bleated by the Jihadist. And yes Jihad is Jihad, there is no exception to that, it is war and killing of non-Muslims. That simple. The reasons for implementing Jihad may differ, but the purpose is clear.
    To summarize:
    Jihad is to kill non Muslims, that is it sole purpose. The reasons to implement Jihad vary.
    Zionism is the return of the Jews to the holy land. The ways to accomplish this are different amongst the different sects of religion.
    Zionist may kill to accomplish their goals. Jihadist goal is to kill.
    You have much to learn Peter.

    Gasdocpol – As I said in my other post, please support with evidence.
    Jihad has been around long before Modern Political Zionism, which is what you refer to when you talk of zionism and the State of Israel.
    Again another page from the liberal handbook, propaganda blah blah blah…. It is the G4 Warfare propaganda machine that has you and most others brainwashed into thinking Muslim Jihadists are righteous, they are greedy killers, nothing more. Look at Arafat, one of the main causes of todays current conflict. What abou the “secular” goverments of Syria, Jordan, Egypt etc.. The list goes on. Please learn about he history instead of using the liberal handbook to try and blast Israel.

  9. Gasdoc – Great liberal handbook post again. Nothing I have not heard before and nothing more than the lies that have been propogate across the Internet over the last decade. Please learn the actual history of what happened, the players involved.
    Additionally, this only covers one small area of the global Jihadist warfare campaign. Look at all the countries that are having problems with Jihadists, many of them for a very long time. These have nothing to do with the US or Israel, although the Jihadist will try to tie them into it.
    Until next weekend, Shalom

  10. Then in your opinion, unconditional support of Israel is the way to go. You are entitled to your opinion.

  11. If there is such a thing as a Liberal handbook, it is in my head as a result of extensive reading and following current events, having lived in Europe for 7 years , seeing much of the world, studying at top universities, having been a physician for over 30 years, being an officer on board ships at sea, running a business and getting an MBA in my spare time .

    I have also listened to the arguments of people like yourself. I am not affiliated to a political party and I have no intention of running for polital office.

    Conceiveably, I could be wrong but my conclusions are my conclusions. I rarely take things on faith alone.

  12. GasDoc
    Thanks for trying to justify your responses. As such a self claimed intelligent person, then I am sure that you realize that you still have not been able to debate about the actual topic, not a single comment with any relevancy to the topic at hand as a matter of fact. Your only arguement is a Bush/Israeli bashing. Makes me wonder how someone so well educated and rounded has so little ability to actually debate the topic, but can only divert the topic as is rule one in the Liberal handbook.
    With all of your credentials, real or made up, I would venture to say that you need to get some real world education. Considering you have said nothing that would indicate a self realization of information, only repeated statements that have come from the liberal left. Maybe if you had said something they had not spewed over and over and over… I would think maybe you had formulated your own opinion.
    Spare me with the credentials, they only make you look like a pompous ass, who is trying to make others think what you say is true because you hold such and such or have done such and such. It is the Internet, unless you can verify said information, it is more diversionary edicate propogated by the liberal left.
    As for listenting to arguments from people like my self, I too can say the same thing, your arguments and tactics are the same as every other liberal following the handbook.
    Use of the liberal handbook has nothing to do with party affiliation or intention to run for political office. There are liberals in all parties.
    Conceiveably, your are wrong in your because they are based on faith alone. Each of your statements you have made are based on faith.
    Unfortunately the source of your self claimed revelations are lies, spins and designed to make you do exactly what you have done.
    Now again, unless you can bring fact, not opinion to the table, your are a waste of my oxygen.

  13. Gasdoc,
    I also never said I supported unconditional support of Israel, that is your assumption.
    What I do realize is that there are many factors that dictate US support of Israel, that are far beyond anything you could comprehend.
    I do believe our support in Israel is important and that it is a matter of National Security that we continue it.
    I think that the liberal mindset of terrorist sympathy is harming our country and the security of the world.

  14. Waste of Oxygen.
    I have given my background and credentials in part in an attempted rebutal to your contention that I have blindly accepted the Liberal line and in part to say how I have arrived at my conclusions. I admit that I have come to the subjective conclusion that goverment spending (obviously ,if done properly) will both have favorable effects indirectly by promoting opportunities for worthy middle and lower class people who will go on to benefit the country and by direct spending in the ecomomy will make the the economy better.

    I really need to research the question to find more objective reasons for that point of view or change my opinion. And I will do that. Maybe there is some truth to what you say.

    You admit to supporting Israel but deny that the US support has been basically unconditional. I claim that is because you fail to recognise that there are 2 sides of the argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: